Under Construction
The NYSBA website is now undergoing scheduled maintenance
Close

The NYSBA Portal and storefront is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance through 9/16/2024. Access to online store purchases, event registration and membership sign are unavailable at this time. Certain functions may still be available by calling our Member Resource Center at 800-582-2452. Click here to learn more

Issue: 2023 Vol 28. No. 1

Update on Structured Attorney Fees

I recently wrote about structured legal fees for lawyers through the New York State Bar Association.1 For nearly 30 years, plaintiff lawyers have been structuring contingent legal fees based on the seminal tax cases of Childs v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 634 (1994), aff’d without opinion, 89 F.3rd 856 (11th Cir. 1996). Payments over time can flatten the peaks … Continued

Message From the Section Chair

It is hard to believe that it has been a year since I took over the reins as the chair of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section. It has been a privilege to serve as section chair during the first full year when the section returned to in-person programming after the COVID-19 pandemic. Our ComFed … Continued

Limitations on the Recovery of Lost Profits

As we stand on the precipice of another economic downturn, a new Commercial Division case arising from the great financial crisis of 2007-2008 is a timely reminder of the limitations on the recovery of lost profit damages. The Commercial Division, Kings County, recently precluded plaintiffs from seeking to recover lost profit damages, finding that such … Continued

Federal Court Standing in a Post-TransUnion World

Introduction Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits federal courts’ jurisdiction to “Cases” and “Controversies.”1 This limitation ensures that the federal judicial power extends only to resolving actual disputes, and not hypothetical disagreements, between parties. Accordingly, to satisfy Article III, the U.S. Supreme Court has long held that the plaintiff, as the party invoking federal jurisdiction, … Continued

Dual Representation in Derivative Litigation: Ever Permissible?

In a shareholder derivative action, the plaintiff is usually required to name the corporation as a “nominal defendant” in order to obtain jurisdiction over it, even though the lawsuit ostensibly seeks relief on behalf of that very corporation. Can the same law firm represent both the company and management, in a derivative suit alleging breach … Continued