Nuclear Weapons and International Law 2025: Nuclear Risks through a Legal Lens
Nuclear Weapons and International Law 2025: Nuclear Risks through a Legal Lens
Thursday, January 30, 2025
9:00 a.m. – 6:30 p.m. via Zoom
(virtual reception to follow)
CO-SPONSORS
- Fordham Law School, Center on National Security
- U.S. Air Force Academy, Law, Technology and Warfare Research Cell
- American Bar Association, International Section
- Georgetown Law School, Journal of International Law
- Catholic Peacebuilding Network
- Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy
- Global Security Institute
CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS
- Charles J. Moxley, Jr., Professor (Adj.), Fordham Law School; Principal, Moxley ADR LLC
- Jeffrey Biller, Director, Law, Technology and Warfare Research Cell, United States Air Force Academy
- Jonathan Granoff, President, Global Security Institute; Senior Advisor, Permanent Secretariat of the World Summits of Nobel Peace Laureates
- Dr. John Burroughs, Senior Analyst, Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy
HOW TO SIGN UP FOR THIS FREE WEBINAR:
- NYSBA Members – Click the blue button that says "Register Here" at the top right of the page.
- Non-NYSBA Members – Email our Member Resource Center (MRC) at [email protected] or call them 800-582-2452/518-463-3724.
AGENDA
See below.
- January 30, 2025
- 9:00 AM
- 6:00 PM
- Virtual Participation
The International Section of
the New York State Bar Association
is proud to sponsor
Nuclear Weapons and International Law 2025:
Nuclear Risks through a Legal Lens
Thursday, January 30, 2025
9:00 a.m. – 6:30 p.m. via Zoom
(virtual reception to follow)
CO-SPONSORS
Fordham Law School, Center on National Security
U.S. Air Force Academy, Law, Technology and Warfare Research Cell
American Bar Association, International Section (invited)
Georgetown Law School, Journal of International Law
Catholic Peacebuilding Network
Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy
Global Security Institute
AGENDA
9:00 – 9:30 a.m. Introductory Remarks
· Prof. Charles J. Moxley, Jr., Professor (Adj.), Fordham Law School; Principal, Moxley ADR LLC
· Prof. John D. Feerick, Professor and Dean Emeritus, Fordham Law School
· Domenick Napoletano, President, New York State Bar Association (invited)
· William R. Bay, President, American Bar Association
· Prof. Jeffrey Biller, Director, Law, Technology and Warfare Research Cell, United States Air Force Academy
· Carlos Ramos-Mrosovsky, Chair, International Section, New York State Bar Association (invited)
· Jonathan Granoff, President, Global Security Institute; Senior Advisor, Permanent Secretariat of the World Summits of Nobel Peace Laureates
9:30 – 10:40 a.m. Panel 1: Contemporary Strategic Environment and Nuclear Weapons Risks
Examining the contemporary strategic environment and related risks of intentional and inadvertent use of nuclear weapons, including the situations in Ukraine and the Middle East; Russia’s expansionism; China’s nuclear build-up and posture towards Taiwan; the United States’ continued focus on nuclear weapons and deterrence; and cyber risks and AI.
Faculty:
· Moderator: Prof. Jeffrey Biller, Director, Law, Technology and Warfare Research Cell, United States Air Force Academy
· Hon. Dr. Christopher Ashley Ford, U.S. Ambassador, Assistant Secretary for International Security and Nonproliferation, U.S. Department of State, 2018-2021
· Daryl G. Kimball, Executive Director, Arms Control Association
· Hans M. Kristensen, Director, Nuclear Information Project, Federation of American Scientists
· Dr. Shane Smith, Director, Institute for National Security Studies and Associate Professor, Dept. of Political Science, United States Air Force Academy
10:40 – 10:50 a.m. Break
10:50 – 12:30 p.m. Panel 2: Application of international law to potential uses of nuclear weapons—practical considerations as to how it works and should work
Examining requirements of international law, as applied in assessing the lawfulness of potential uses of nuclear weapons, including examination of how such analysis is and should be conducted at various stages from the design, development, and acquisition of such weapons through potential use of the weapons; consideration of what potential effects of the use of a nuclear weapon are or should be considered in assessing the lawfulness of potential uses of such weapons; consideration of how certain one must be of the various potential effects of the use of a nuclear weapon for such potential effects to be relevant to the assessment of the lawfulness of such a use; consideration of how one assesses the lawfulness of various levels of likelihood of potentially unlawful effects of such weapons; the role of uncertainties and unknowns as to potential effects of nuclear weapons uses in assessing the lawfulness of such uses; requirements under international law for per se unlawfulness of weapons uses; consideration of the continuing role, if any, of jus ad bellum once a State is engaged in armed conflict and jus in bello has become applicable; the role, if any, of legal advisors who have advised that potential uses of a nuclear weapon would be unlawful.
Faculty:
· Moderator: Dr. John Burroughs, Senior Analyst, Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy
· Lieutenant Colonel Travis Lieb, United States Army, Deputy Staff Judge Advocate at United States Strategic Command
· Prof. Charles J. Moxley, Jr., Professor (Adj.), Fordham Law School; Principal, Moxley ADR LLC
· Prof. Michael N. Schmitt, Professor Emeritus and the Stockton Distinguished Scholar-in-Residence at the U.S. Naval War College
· Allen S. Weiner, Senior Lecturer in Law and Director, Stanford Program in International Law (invited)
12:30 – 1:15 p.m. Lunch
12:45 – 1:15 p.m. Luncheon Reflections: Contemporary realties as to the roles of nuclear weapons and nuclear deterrence—A Conversation between Thomas Countryman, Board Chairman, Arms Control Association, (invited) and Jonathan Granoff
1:15 – 2:25 p.m. Panel 3: Discussion: Contemporary realties as to the role of international law now and in the future as concerns potential uses of nuclear and other weapons
Is international law concerning the use of force meaningful? To what extent does––can––it play a significant role in restraining uses of force in armed conflict? What role has it played historically? What has the level of compliance been? What is the trend? Is its role potentially different as concerns nuclear weapons? What is the impact of the sheer level of armaments on prospects of warring parties’ compliance with international law? To what extent does the political leadership care about the requirements of international law? To what extent does the military leadership care about such requirements? To what extent does this vary from State to State? What are the real world practicalities as to how and whether requirements of international law would make a difference in decision-making as to nuclear weapons in exigent circumstances?
Faculty:
· Moderator: Prof. Jeffrey Biller, Director, Law, Technology and Warfare Research Cell, United States Air Force Academy
· Dr. Laura Grego, Senior Scientist and Research Director, Union of Concerned Scientists
· Lieutenant Commander Christopher J. Hart, USN, J.D., Assistant Professor, United States Naval Academy
· Brady Mabe, Legal Advisor, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
· Colonel Theodore T. Richard, United States Air Force Judge Advocate, Staff Judge Advocate at Space Operations Command
2:25 – 2:35 p.m. Break
2:35 – 3:15 p.m. Keynote: William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense, 1994-1997
3:15 – 4:45 p.m. Panel 4: The international law of threat and nuclear deterrence—a deep dive
Threat law: Examining the law of threat under jus ad bellum and jus in bello and the applicability, if any, of jus ad bellum in the course of armed conflict; rulings of the ICJ and other courts on the law of threat; generally accepted rules of law across the world’s legal systems concerning threats.
Nuclear deterrence: Examining the contemporary theory and practice of nuclear deterrence, including the scope of the “vital interests” it is designed to protect and the scope of nuclear weapons uses it projects––and whether that scope of potential use of nuclear weapons exceeds uses that could comply with law; consideration of whether, or at what point, and the extent to which deterrence rises to the level of constituting a “threat” as a matter of law; advisory opinion of the ICJ on threat and use of nuclear weapons; question of whether nuclear deterrence may lawfully be used to address potential military challenges for which conventional weapons would suffice.
Faculty:
Moderator: Prof. Charles J. Moxley, Jr., Professor (Adj.), Fordham Law School; Principal, Moxley ADR LLC
· Dr. John Burroughs, Senior Analyst, Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy
· Prof. Claire Finkelstein, Algernon Biddle Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School
· Prof. Anna Hood, Associate Professor, University of Auckland
· Colonel Theodore T. Richard, United States Air Force Judge Advocate, Staff Judge Advocate at Space Operations Command
· Prof. David L. Luban, University Professor and Professor of Law and Philosophy, Georgetown University Law Center
4:45 – 4:55 p.m. Break
4:55 – 6:25 p.m. Panel 5: Broadening the discussion—examining additional approaches and legal regimes potentially applicable to risks posed by nuclear weapons: a brainstorming session
Potential relevance of other areas of law and legal approaches in assessing the lawfulness of the threat and use of nuclear weapons, including: the overriding potential of law for addressing serious matters; human rights law; fiduciary obligations of corporate officers and directors of defense contractors; domestic criminal law; crimes against humanity; crimes against the peace; universal jurisdiction; environmental law; ICJ jurisdiction; ICC jurisdiction; prerequisites for injunctive relief under international law; legal principles applicable to potential inchoate violations of international law; tort law; the Alien Tort Claims Act and similar such statutes; legal regime applicable to obligations, if any, of nuclear weapons states to maintain security of their nuclear weapons; role of lawyers in nuclear weapons policy and decision-making.
Faculty:
Opening thoughts on the potential of law: Hon. Shira Scheindlin (U.S.D.J., Ret.), Of Counsel, Boise Schiller Flexner LLP
· Moderator: Prof. Charles J. Moxley, Jr., Professor (Adj.), Fordham Law School; Principal, Moxley ADR LLC
· David Gibson, Fordham Center on Religion and Culture; Catholic Peacekeeping Network
· Prof. Richard W. Painter, S. Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law,
University of Minnesota Law School
· Prof. Daniel Rietiker, Ph.D., International Law Lecturer, Lausanne University, Adjunct Professor, Suffolk University Law School (Boston MA)
· Randy Rydell, Executive Advisor, Mayors for Peace; Senior Political Affairs Officer, Office of the High Representative for Disarmament Affairs (Ret.)
· Jules Zacher, Board Chair, Council for a Livable World; Executive Board Member, the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law at the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania
6:25 – 6:35 p.m. Closing Reflections
· Jonathan Granoff, President, Global Security Institute; Senior Advisor, Permanent Secretariat of the World Summits of Nobel Peace Laureates
· Prof. Jeffrey Biller, Director, Law, Technology and Warfare Research Cell, United States Air Force Academy
· Dr. John Burroughs, Senior Analyst, Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy
· Prof. Charles J. Moxley, Jr., Professor (Adj.), Fordham Law School; Principal, Moxley ADR LLC
6:30 – 7:30 p.m. Virtual reception
- Webinar
- INT13025
- International Section