Authenticating What You Cannot Trust: Synthetic Media and Deepfake Evidence in IP and Patent Disputes

By the end of the webinar, participants should be able to:
· Distinguish authentication from relevance, hearsay, best-evidence, and expert-reliability questions.
· Select a supportable federal or New York authentication route for common digital-media exhibits.
· Use the 2026 New York Court of Appeals decision in Matter of M.S. to recognize foundation and chain-of-custody weaknesses in video evidence.
· Preserve source, capture, metadata, integrity, and transformation information before those facts disappear.
· Explain what a cryptographic hash can establish and what it cannot.
· Use detector output as a technical input without presenting probability as a legal conclusion.
· State the current status of proposed Rule 707 and the Rule 901(c) working draft without treating either as law.
· Build a concise foundation or challenge record for a disputed digital exhibit.
- September 25, 2026
- 1:00 PM
- 2:00 PM
- 1.0
- 1.0
- Virtual Participation
- Alexander Paykin, Esq., Managing Director, Paykin Law, Chair, NYSBA Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession
- Pouya Shafabakhsh, AIGP, CAIC, Principal Judicial Forensic AI Auditor, Co-Founder and Chief AI Governance Officer, Radsam Academy of AI Sovereign Governance
- Webinar
- 0RD11
- Committee on Continuing Legal Education
- Committee on Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies
- Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession
- Committee on Law Practice Management
- Intellectual Property Law Section

