AI for Lawyers: Avoiding Hallucinations and Preserving Privilege

This program addresses AI use and compliance on two fronts: the widely publicized problem of "hallucinations," the fabricated cases and quotations that have drawn sanctions against lawyers and their firms in both California and New York, and the data-handling questions litigators face before entering client-confidential information into an AI tool.
The panel will discuss recent sanctions decisions from both states arising out of AI-fabricated citations, along with the ethical duties they implicate: competence, candor toward the tribunal, and supervision. It will compare the two states' evolving regulatory approaches to AI use by lawyers and courts. Turning to confidentiality and privilege, the panel will look at how courts are beginning to address whether AI use affects privilege and work-product protection. It will close with practical guidance for AI-assisted research and what to look for in an AI vendor on training, retention, security, and contractual protections.
Panelists include litigators practicing in California and New York and an executive from an AI provider.
| Agenda | |||||||
| 3:00 | p.m. | – | 3:05 | p.m. | Welcome and Introduction | ||
| Moderator: | |||||||
| Nitesh Daryanani Counsel Midpage New York, NY |
|||||||
| 3:05 | p.m. | – | 3:25 | p.m. | Hallucinations and the Duty of Candor | ||
|
· Survey of recent sanctions decisions in California and New York involving fabricated cases and quotations · Ethical duties implicated: competence, candor toward the tribunal, and supervisory obligations · Comparing regulatory approaches: New York's court rule on AI use and California's AI-focused amendments to its Rules of Professional Conduct · Practical verification workflows for AI-assisted research |
|||||||
| Panelists: | |||||||
|
Marc Lewis Arlo Devlin-Brown Rhick Bose |
|||||||
| 3:25 | p.m. | – | 3:55 | p.m. | Confidentiality, Privilege, and Data Handling | ||
|
· Confidentiality obligations when inputting client information into AI tools · Privilege and work-product implications of AI use, including early court decisions on whether AI use waives protection · Guidance from recent cases and ethics opinions on lawyers' use of generative AI · What to look for in an AI vendor: training on user data, retention, security, and contractual protections |
|||||||
| Panelists: | |||||||
|
Marc Lewis Arlo Devlin-Brown Rhick Bose |
|||||||
| 1.0 Credits in Ethics and Professionalism | |||||||
| 3:55 | p.m. | – | 4:00 | p.m. | Audience Q&A and Closing Remarks | ||
| Panelists: | |||||||
|
Marc Lewis Arlo Devlin-Brown Rhick Bose |
|||||||
| Moderator: | |||||||
| Nitesh Daryanani, Counsel Midpage |
|||||||
Thank You to Our Sponsor
- October 27, 2026
- 3:00 PM
- 4:00 PM
- 1.0
- 1.0
- Virtual Participation
- Webinar
- 0RE11
- Committee on Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies
- Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession
- Committee on Continuing Legal Education


