Impertinent Questions: The Unusual Case of <i>Gorsuch v. Alito</i> and the Supreme Court’s Textualist Approach to Judging
In their recent holding in Bostock v. Clayton Cty.,[1] the Supreme Court held that use of the word “sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964[2] allows for court actions to redress gender-based discriminatory acts. In a majority opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the Court held: The statute’s message for our cases … Continued
