Ethics Opinion 082

By Committee on Professional Ethics

May 21, 1968

Ethics Opinion 082

5.21.1968

By Committee on Professional Ethics

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Professional Ethics Committee Opinion

Opinion # 82 – 05/21/1968 (3-68)

Topic: Conflict of Interests; Municipal attorneys
Digest: Partners or associates defending criminal matters in county where one associate is part-time assistant district attorney
Canons: Former Canons 6, 37

QUESTION

A salaried associate of a law firm who has no interest in the earnings of the firm has been appointed as a part-time Assistant District Attorney for which he receives a salary in which the firm has no interest.  Does this preclude the partners and other associates of the law firm from handling criminal matters pending in the same county?

OPINION

In a closely related question, we held in Opinion No. 40 – 12/22/66 (20-66) that it was not ethically proper for a lawyer to engage in the defense of traffic  cases or minor misdemeanors before Justice’s Courts in the same county in which  the lawyer’s  law partner served  on a part-time basis as an Assistant District Attorney.  In the same Opinion, we pointed out that the relationship between partners and associates of a law firm is so close that no distinction could be made between them with respect to prohibited conflicts irrespective of whether the lawyer served with the firm on a full or part-time basis.Accordingly, under these same principles, it is the opinion of this Committee that neither the partners nor associates of the firm may engage in criminal practice in the same county where one of the firm associates holds a position as Assistant District Attorney.

Six diverse people sitting holding signs
gradient circle (purple) gradient circle (green)

Join NYSBA

My NYSBA Account

My NYSBA Account