Opinion #205 – 10/26/1971 (40-71)
adverse interests, children, confidences, conflict of interests, client consent, employment, representation
Topic: Conflict of Interest
Digest: Improper to represent both estate and claimant against estate in negligence action
Code: EC 5-15; DR 5-105
Where a lawyer represents the estate of a decedent who was fatally injured in a two car accident, may he also represent the son-in-law of the decedent in an action against the estate of decedent for personal injuries sustained while a passenger in the decedent’s vehicle in the same accident?
The question in this case is essentially the same as that decided in two previous opinions relating to actions by children against patents, N.Y. State 74 (1968) and N.Y. State 112 (1969). A lawyer should never represent in litigation multiple clients with differing interest EC 5-15.It is impossible to avoid a conflict of loyalty in the situation described in the question. A decision has to be made whether to sue the lawyer’s own client; even if an insurance company is involved, cooperation with the insurance company is required under the policy; it may become the duty of the attorney to press for recovery on behalf of the plaintiff against the estate exceeding the limits of coverage.A lawyer so representing both parties could not possibly carry out his obligation of undivided loyalty to each of them. Such dual representation would be improper.