Ethics Opinion 225

By Committee on Professional Ethics

Professional Ethics Committee Opinions

Opinion #225 – 01/26/1972 (58-71)
Topic: Fees
Digest: Attorney for judgment creditor may charge judgment debtor reasonable fee for preparation of satisfaction of judgment
Code: EC 5-19


May the attorney for a judgment creditor charge the judgment debtor for the preparation of a satisfaction of judgment?


It is not ethically improper for an attorney representing a judgment creditor to charge the judgment debtor reasonable fee for services in preparing a satisfaction of judgment provided that such preparation is not required by law. Cf. CPLR 5020 which requires that the judgment creditor or his attorney execute and deliver a satisfaction piece upon payment of the judgment. An attorney may, of course, charge his client, the judgment creditor, a fee for the preparation of the instrument and need not look to the judgment debtor. It would appear that no question of conflict of interest is involved. EC 5-19.In the event the judgment debtor prepares the instrument there, of course, may be no charge therefor made by the creditor’s attorney.

Six diverse people sitting holding signs
gradient circle (purple) gradient circle (green)


My NYSBA Account

My NYSBA Account