Ethics Opinion 263

By Committee on Professional Ethics

September 15, 1972

Ethics Opinion 263

9.15.1972

By Committee on Professional Ethics

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Committee on Professional Ethics

Opinion #263 – 09/15/1972 (48-72)

Topic: Private practice by Temporary Acting Judge
Digest: Temporary Acting Judge with criminal jurisdiction should not engage in private criminal practice
Code: Canon 9; EC 9-2; 9-6; Code of Judicial Conduct: Canon 2

QUESTION

May a lawyer who is appointed Temporary Acting Judge to preside during the absence or disability of a judge of a court having criminal jurisdiction, represent clients in criminal matters before the same court or other courts when not discharging his duties as judge?

OPINION

It has frequently been declared that a part-time judge with criminal jurisdiction may not represent clients in criminal matters in his private practice. N.Y. State 228 (1972); N.Y. State 203 (1971); N.Y. State 181 (1971); N.Y. State 146 (1970). See Canon 9; EC 9-2, 9-6; Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2. A Temporary Acting Judge with criminal jurisdiction is subject to the same restrictions while he is in office for the same reasons set forth in the above cited opinions.

Six diverse people sitting holding signs
gradient circle (purple) gradient circle (green)

Join NYSBA

My NYSBA Account

My NYSBA Account