Ethics Opinion 266

By Committee on Professional Ethics

October 20, 1972

Ethics Opinion 266

10.20.1972

By Committee on Professional Ethics

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Committee on Professional Ethics

Opinion #266 – 10/20/1972 (50-72)

Topic: Firm Name; Retired Partner
Digest: Proper for name of retired partner to remain in partnership name
Code:  EC 2-11; DR 2-102(B)

QUESTION

May the name of a former partner in a law firm be continued in the firm name in the event he continues to practice law on a limited basis?

OPINION

A law firm may continue the name of a retired partner in the partnership name provided he does not practice law independently of the firm and provided the firm is a bona fide successor to the firm of which the retiring partner was a member. DR 2-102 (B); EC 2-11.So long as the former partner has a continuing relationship with the firm and to the extent he practices law it is with his former firm, he will not be considered to be practicing independently of the firm and the firm may properly continue his name as a part of the firm name. N.Y. State 70 (1968); cf. Drinker, Legal Ethics 206 (1953); N.Y. City 40 (1926); N.Y. County 170 (1919); ABA 97 (1933).For the circumstances under which the term “of counsel” may be used to designate the former partner, see N.Y. State 262 (1972).

Six diverse people sitting holding signs
gradient circle (purple) gradient circle (green)

Join NYSBA

My NYSBA Account

My NYSBA Account