NYSBA Ethics Opinion 10

NYSBA Ethics Opinion 10

1.29.1965

By Committee on Professional Ethics

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION

Professional Ethics Committee Opinion

Opinion #10 – 01/29/1965 (1-65)

Topic: Encouraging Fraudulent Divorce
Digest: Improper for lawyer to arrange foreign state divorce where foreign court is not advised with respect to the client’s actual residence
Canon: None

QUESTION

An opinion is requested as to the propriety of the following actions by a New York attorney:
1.         Is it unethical for a New York attorney to send a client to an Alabama lawyer for the purpose of obtaining an Alabama divorce when the New York Lawyer knows his client is not domiciled in Alabama?
2.         Is it unethical for a New York attorney to refer a client to another New York attorney specializing in matrimonial matters where the first attorney has reason to believe that the matrimonial specialist will arrange for the client to obtain an Alabama divorce and where both attorneys know that the client is not domiciled in Alabama?

OPINION

It seems apparent from the wording of the question submitted that it is contemplated that the Alabama court would not be informed that the client is not a bonafide resident of that state.If such is the case, it will be improper for a member of the New York Bar to advise or assist in the procuring of the divorce.If, however, the foreign court is fully advised with respect to the client’s actual residence and there is no imposition upon the other party to the marriage and the client intends to establish an actual and bonafide residence in the State of Alabama, there would, in our opinion, be no impropriety.
This question was considered by the Committee on Professional Ethics of the New York County Lawyers Association (Question No. 1.00, “Opinions on Professional Ethics”, William Nelson Cromwell Foundation, page 568).
A majority of that Committee found that the mere fact that the New York statutes do not provide for the relief desired is not in itself sufficient ground to condemn the participation of a New York lawyer in aid of a divorce in a foreign jurisdiction according to the law there in effect. The Committee pointed out that the vice of the arrangement arises from the possibility of imposition upon the injured party and a proposed fraud upon the foreign court by concealment of the true facts.With respect to question 2, if the circumstances are such that it is unethical for the New York attorney to send his client to Alabama for the purpose of obtaining an Alabama divorce, it is equally unethical for him to refer a client to another New York attorney for that purpose.