NYSBA Ethics Opinion 14NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Professional Ethics Committee Opinion
Opinion #14 – 09/20/1965 (4-65)
confidences, disclosure, duty of lawyer, fraud, secrets, unlawful or illegal
Topic: Disclosure of Client’s Confidences
Digest: Lawyer should take steps to see that former client does not successfully perpetrate fraudulent claim, and disclosure of that client’s confidences to avoid a crime would be proper
Canon: Former Canon 37
A lawyer was consulted by a client who claimed to have been a passenger in an automobile involved in a one-car accident. After claim had been made against the operator and also against the owner of the vehicle, the client told the lawyer that the client was not in fact a passenger but was the unlicensed operator of the automobile. The lawyer thereupon advised the client that pursuit of the claim would be a fraud and that the client had no cause of action, advising that the client drop the matter. The lawyer has now been advised by another lawyer that the client seeks the other lawyer’s services in pressing the claim.Concerned by the fact that the information was given him in confidence and by the fact that the client is about to perpetrate a fraud by making a false claim, the lawyer inquires whether he is bound by the confidential communication and prevented from advising the new attorney of the facts and likewise prevented from exposing the fraud if it is continued.
In the opinion of the Committee the lawyer should:
(a) Advise the client in writing that the lawyer is obligated to disclose the true facts and give the client an opportunity to release the claim;
(b) Failing an acknowledgment that the claim is released, the lawyer should advise the new attorney and the person or persons against whom the claim has been made of the true facts.Anything short of a release of the claim or notification of the defendants would, or course, mean that the client could take advantage of some third lawyer whose identity would not be known, and the claim might be pressed quietly to a fraudulent conclusion.
Canon: 37 specifically provides that “the announced intention of a client to commit a crime is not included within the confidences which he (the lawyer) is bound to respect. He may properly make such disclosures as may be necessary to prevent the action to protect those against whom it is threatened”.
See Opinion No. 84 New York County Lawyers Association on the same subject.See U.S. against Clark, 289 U.S. 1 (53 Supreme Court 465), wherein Judge Cardozo said in part, “There is a privilege protecting communications between attorney and client. The privilege takes flight if the relation is abused. A client who consults an attorney for advice that will serve him in the commission of a fraud will have no help from the law. He must let the truth be told.”